Knjižnica dokumenata

Analize i izvješća iz think-tankova i OSINT izvora

Experts say Hamas has few incentives to disarm.

Kim Jong Un is orchestrating his daughter’s ascent through a campaign of maternal statecraft.

Deceptive job schemes and transnational networks are pulling Kenyans into Moscow’s war.

Malaysia becomes the first country to cancel its tariff deal with the White House.

Trump’s latest gambit to reopen the Strait of Hormuz has inflamed the fragile cease-fire with Iran.

Ukraine and its partners are holding their breath to see what’s next for Patriot air defense missile deliveries.

The West ignores the warning signs in the Sahel at its own peril.

The so-called Tower fiasco took place in a very different Washington to today.

Trump’s war exposes the limits of collective action among the lesser powers.

The United States has given up on one of its core international strengths.

The Western-led order that emerged after the 20th century’s three energy shocks is losing its grip.

The White House argues that the U.S.-Iran cease-fire paused the clock.

Kevin Warsh will face intense pressure to cut interest rates.

Even the most entertaining tale carries a political message.

The Iran war is choking supply of the world’s most expensive spice.

A new book explores the geopolitical scheming that created the blood countess legend.

A new horror film reckons with the country’s buried sins—and the women erased by them.

Test yourself on the week of April 25: Iran offers to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, the UAE leaves OPEC, and Colombia hosts a conference.

Plus, more international fiction releases in May.

Israeli leaders seem increasingly comfortable with the collapse of the Palestinian Authority.

Xi’s new commanders are the men his last generals blocked.

He hoped it would be transformational; instead, it’s just one more round in the conflict.

The geopolitical realignment goes much deeper than just oil markets.

The country is trying to push for a green transition despite gridlock at U.N. climate talks.

The Section 301 case outlined by U.S. trade officials is neither coherent nor defensible.